THE STOA COLLECTION

Reseach note #1

IMPLICATIONS OF THE BOOKTITLE ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BOOK.

With sidepaths on economics of the trade and the taste of the public.

 

One major topic of the collection is Calculation. On the other hand there are also sections Nietzscheana, Casanoviana, German and Dutch literature and many others, being presently in total 1.600 titles  all fully described and arranged by section and year of publication as appropriate. Apart from this subject-oriented approach, it also was tried to include copies in the collection, that together give an interesting illustration of other aspects of antiquarian books.

In this note it is tried to arrange and describe copies in the collection relevant to the title of this research paper. The arrangement could be suggestive, however it is felt, that this note is just a beginning of phrasing any final conclusions on the material selected, for which the input of other scholars is encouraged.

Also this first note is an experiment in digital communication. A preliminary impression is, that the number of illustrations [all in colour] is extremely difficult to negotiate with an editor in the printed press.

Any reactions are more than welcome at djvanham@xs4all.nl .

 

BOOKTITLE

is such a stated other aspect.

Before 1600 books were stored on the bookshelf with the fore-edges upfront, as can be seen on this picture of Calvin in his study.

 

 

This must be around 1550.

It cannot be seen on the picture how Calvin could see what the content of his books were. A copy from the collection [book #74198] shows a solution to this problem by writing the title on the fore-edge.

 

 

It is from a copy of Tunstall, De Arte Supputandi, 1522 [book #74198] being an early instruction in the basics of calculation, in those years a quite high level topic.

In later years it was thought, that having the books on shelf with the spine upfront was more practical, the fore-edge being a difficult and uneven surface for writing a the title on it. And so is it until today on all private bookshelves.

 

Aspects of titles in the  booktrade

There are also other purposes than identifying a book on a bookshelf, that especially are relevant in the booktrade.

 

Halftitle

Unbound books [as often traded before 1800] could more easily be identified by a halftitle on A1 recto.

 

Stubs

In some 18th century books a stub can be found at the rpep, of which the following is an example:

 

Book # 01249 [actual size] 1

 

This book [1764] was acquired in a lot of 6, all books having a stub like this. Evidently the former owner collected such things. The stub only can be understood, when once it continued as a tape out of the head of the book. The title being written on the tape, books could then be easily identified from for instance a narrow case of a travelling salesman, only the heads showing.

In another copy from this lot the tape is partly conserved and an identification number is written on it:

 

 

Upper board

After 1850 the title often was shown on the upper board as well. This has no practical purpose on a bookshelf, however for exposition in shops the much larger surface of the upper board is a more effective tool of introductory communication with a potential buyer than the narrow spine. The book then should be shown with the upper board up on a shelf or table, as still can be seen in modern bookshops.

 

A late example is [UK 1898]:

 

 

The major innovation applied in binding a book like this is case binding, manufacturing the binding in a separate productionrun and than joining it with the bookblock.

 

 

The illustration is from Philip Gaskell, A New Introduction to Bibliography, 1972, where it illustrates a chapter on edition binding on pp. 231-34. However in binding books like this the full technical potential of advanced binding machinery from around 1850 was not used.

 

Integrated binding machines

In this advanced machinery all steps of the binding process  were integrated, however this made it only cost effective for batches of 1000 copies or even more.

An early example is Friedrich Bodenstedt, Die Lieder des Mirza-Schaffy, 2nd edition 1853:

 

 

Helwig (p. 254) mentions C W Vogt [Berlin] as the binder. Taking into account the large number of editions [1 to sometimes a year up to around 1900] the publisher could afford to have the whole edition bound after printing. It would sell within one year anyhow. Vogt in the time was the only bookbinder able to handle such larger volumes in the Berlin area.

Sales were still uncertain however when planning the 1st edition. Possibly as a result of that there is a privately bound copy of that edition in the collection [book # 43863], evidently coming from a cheap wrappered batch. It further is worth noting, that the 177 copies of this title offered in trade in 2007 on ZVAB [the major German antiquarian website] do not include any wrappered or privately bound copies, suggesting, that they just do not exist after the rare 1st edition.

 

A later [1897] example of such a birthday-present category edition  is:

 

 

 

This is really state of the art design for that year. It is extensively discussed by Buddensieg from a history of art point of view.

From a publishing point of view it is important to note, that also here steady sales were more or less certain. The title was printed and published by Naumann in Leipzig until it merged with Kröner in 1909. Concerning the timing and volume of the production of titles by Friedrich Nietzsche at Naumann a detailed record is preserved in the Auflagenbuch, a small handwritten notebook prepared for the Nietzsche-Archiv and now in the Goethe-Schiller Archiv in Weimar. For this specific edition the following numbers of copies were put to press:

1897         2000

1898         2000

1899         2000

1900         2000

1901         3000 

1902         4000             

1903         4000

1906         4000

1907         4000

 

More risky titles

However for the majority of literary and scientific titles sales to be realized were much less certain.

To get an impression of the composition of the contemporary costprice of a book, the following is extracted from production records of Routledge Kegan Paul [1922, for the detailed record see below]. [Amounts are GBP1922]

 

Typesetting     65

Printing          14

Paper               17

Other                 6

Total              102

 

As type is too expensive and heavy to stay over to print a second edition it was usually discomposed after completing the 1st printing. Thus the cost of  the only really fixed cost component typesetting should be fully allocated to the 1st  edition. A larger size of the printrun then results in a lower price per copy. However the additional variable cost of Printing and Paper and the risk not to sell printed material in the end counterbalance this effect. As a result publishers for more risky titles usually arrive at a printrun of 1000-2000 copies.

The edition of our example consisted of 1500 copies. Binding all those would amount to an additional expense of approx. GBP 50, thus a relatively large investment and a major costprice component in the ultimate calculation of the publisher.

 

Interlude on profit margin

The sales price of our example was 10’/6”, of which 40% usually went to the bookseller. Thus a total revenue of 472 remains for the publisher. Not bad on 152 cost.

 

Risk reducing solutions

For the production of printed sheets a quite large edition is unavoidable.

However for the later stages of production of a book risk-reducing solutions are shown in the production process.

Examples:

 

Binding in smaller batches than printing text

For binding however also much simpler machinery was in use than those of the integrated type discussed above. A series of smaller machines for the separate stages of the production process allowed smaller production batches.

The sacrifice of a higher costprice per copy as a result of a less efficient production process was compensated by reduction of risk, the binding and related cost being postponed to the moment, that a potential buyer was almost at the door.

The typical size of such a smaller batch is not known.

In letters exchanged between Leo Simons and the publishers Fisher Unwin [now at NYPL] Simons tried to find a solution for problems between the publisher and a binder. Simons remarks that a binding run of 25 copies ordered is too small is of interest here. So it should be more in view of the efficiency of the binder.

A similar type of binding was done in Germany by the bindery Hübel & Denck for Naumann publishers on Nietzsche titles in the Gross-Oktav series. At a physical inventory count in 1893 bound copies were recorded seperately, the largest number counted for copies of an individual title being 73.

The publishers stock of the Dutch author Multatuli was auctioned in 1880. Like in the Naumann inventory this stock was only partially bound. Of the 7 volumes of Multatuli’s Ideen the largest number of copies stated in the catalog of the auction [only copy known now in the Multatulimuseum, Amsterdam] for an individual volume was 165.

So binding batches suggested by those examples possibly vary from 50-200, and are certainly much smaller than a usual printing batch of 1000-2000.

Gaskell labels the practice secondary binding. The examples show, that it was practised not only in the UK, but also in Germany and The Netherlands.

Later copies can sometimes be identified by publisher ads added with a date later than that on title. An extreme example is a copy in the collection of a title in the RKP Ogden Series, being Rignano, Biological Memory [book #23492], which has 1926 on title and 1949 in the publisher ads. Of interest for the following paragraph is, that based on its content also the dustjacket on the copy should be dated 1926. The price on  the jacket is 10’/6” [see spine and  the fundlist on the rear] being the 1926 price. The publisher ads state a 1949 price of 12’/6”.

 

Dustjackets

Possibly the underlying idea is, that a jacket can simply be printed, thus realising the economies of text, and printing it in an according large  batch.

See the Production Ledger of a volume of Ogden Series described below.

Gaskell p. 250 remarks that decline of pictorial casing and the evolution of jackets occurred simultaneously 1890-1907.

Rosner summarizes early examples, the oldest being from around 1900. however in the collection are even earlier copies:

Heine Romanzero, 1851.

 

  

 

Wrappers

A different solution to reduce economic risk is to reduce the cost of the primary binding itself. Also simplifying this binding has as additional advantage, that the publisher can eliminate the binder from the production process, replacing him by a low qualified clerk or possibly his wife or older children. Gaskell [p. 248] discusses wrappers, and from his words we can conclude, that wrappers in the UK never came beyond the station bookstore. Gaskell does not discuss in detail however the developments outside the UK.

Especially in The Netherlands we can find prototype examples of the of  binding in [printed] wrappers.  A schematic sketch of the construction is:

 

 

The novelty is that  at the hinge the pastedown does not continue as flying endpaper,but is folded around the 1st quire, and then folded inwards thus returning at the recto of that. In all copies known there it is just a strip of paper of a few cm. wide and not a full ffep. [thus saving material?]. Usually thin boards are thus attached to the bookblock quite effectively. The wrapper is often quite thin paper, but as it is pasted to boards and spine the resulting book is not too vulnarable. In The Netherlands this method was in quite use. In the collection are examples from Amsterdam [Portielje, 1830, book #23231], Middelburg [Abrahams, 1853, book # 74202] and Haarlem [Kruseman, 1855, book #33747]. I once also saw a copy from Leeuwarden [Suringar].

In later wrappered copies board and fpep are omitted and the wrapper is directly glued to the spine only. This could be because,  better glue becoming available, the wrapper thus could be effectively attached to the uneven spine only. The end result however is not a very sound construction, resulting in nasty conservation problems in the present time.

 

There is only one German example of prototype wrapper binding in the collection, Stuttgart, Cotta, 1831 [book #23482]. Possibly it was the strong position of the bookbindersguild, that slowed down the development of such binding alternatives in Germany. Those guilds were liquidated successively in the German Länder, last in Saxony [Leipzig!] in 1862.

So by the time it was allowed in Germany for publishers to bypass the bookbinders, the direct glueing discussed for The Netherlands was already available. Helwig mentions special workshops for such work, the personnel of which had a very low professional standing.

An indication, that in Germany possibly all copies of an edition were wrappered in one batch, is the remark of Schmeitzner in a letter to Nietzsche in 1874, where he states that he sent 600 copies [of an edition of 1000] to bookstores on sight. A typical German custom, bookstores having credit until the next bookfair when the books should be paid for or returned.

A later example of a German wrappers copy is shown here, because it is so really mint [book #2553]

 

 

Public taste

Apart from all that, there are also matters of public taste influencing the composition of an edition.

An example is the preference of UK readers for uncut books, amazingly in more or less permanent publisher’s bindings, during the larger part of the 19th century.

That changed in the first decade of the 20th century:

 

The translation of Friedrich Nietzsche’s Jenseits von Gut und Böse, finished already in 1898 by Helen Zimmern, was finally published in 1907. The larger copy to the left is traditionally uncut, pp. being 195 mm. high. In the copy to the right pp. are only 180 mm. high. The type is identical, printed by The Darien Press, Edinburgh [see verso of title]. The edition comes with two titlepages one stating Foulis and the other The Good European Society as publisher. Also copies with both titlepages occur.   No relation exist between variances in binding and titlepage. The edition sold out quite quickly, being followed by a 2nd edition in 1909.

 

Thus cut and uncut copies [in smaller bindings] co-exist in this edition without any indication of a time preference.

 

 

This picture shows a cut copy above and an uncut one below, both opened at p. 105. It should be remarked, that also the details of the typesetting of the note [most liable to showing variance] exactly agrees in both binding variants.

 

Another example of such co-existing variants from the same type, evidently addressing differences in the taste of the public, are the following jacketed and unjacketed copies of Buck, The Life of Casanova, 1924.

 

 

 

Of the traditional variant in orange boards pages are uncut and 195 mm. high. In the other variant in black boards pages are cut to a 185 mm. height, copies occasionally occur with a dustjacket, that consequently only fits on the smaller variant.

Both variants share an identical printed paper title on spine:

 

 

 

The Ogden-Series at Routledge Kegan Paul

In 2001 the collection acquired a copy of Frank Ramsey, The Foundations of Mathematics, 1931 [book #13007]. It is a later volume in the INTERNATIONAL LIBRARY OF PSYCHOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY AND SCIENTIFIC METHOD. The series started in 1922, the editor for many years was C. K. Ogden. An earlier title Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, 1922 presently is the most expensive title. Senior booksellers could not tell too much about the Series and its editor. Irrelevant here  but intersting is, that Price [Oxford] remembers having seen Ogden laying out many documents in a London club around 1960,  in an effort to convince the publisher not to replace this 1922 he edited. The 1961 Guinnes/McPearson new translation  shows, that his arguments were not effective.

The most interesting asset of the Ramsey copy acquired is the dedication on ffep:

 

Plate 1 13007, actual size

Ramsey died in 1930 aged 26, the Foundations being his collected works published posthumously. Lettice is his widow. Ramsey helped Ogden with the translation of Wittgensteins Tractatus from the German into English in 1922. Further  'During his first year back at Cambridge [in 1929], Ramsey was not only Wittgenstein's most valued partner in philosophical discussion, but also his closest friend. For the first two weeks after his arrival he lived with the Ramseys at their home in Mortimer Road. Ramsey's wife, Lettice, soon became a close friend and confidante - a woman who, "at last has succeeded in soothing the fierceness of the savage hunter", as Keynes put it. She had the kind of robust sense of humour and earthy honesty that could make him relax, and gain his trust' (Monk, p. 258). In summary, Ramsey and his wife should be placed quite close to Wittgenstein in the Cambridge circles of the early 30s.

This clearly is an important association copy, the only remaining uncertainty in the evaluation preparing its acquisition being the absence of a dustjacket on the copy. The question seemed valid looking at the 8th [and last] edition of the Ogden translation, 1960 and in a dustjacket.  [book #12782]. Experts in the booktrade assured me however, that on an early copy of the series like this Ramsey, dustjackets were never seen.

Content with their assurance, the Ramsey copy was acquired, without jacket [as usual].

Two years later Bill Schaberg [Athena Rare Books] acquired 2 jacketed copies of the 1922 Tractatus. My involvement in assisting him explaining those copies were the main cause of two actions.

 

1. Browsing for other early copies of the Ogden series in dustjacket, with the following result presently on the Ogden-series shelf of the collection:

 

 

 

 

This picture does not answer the valid question phrased by the Los Angeles bookseller Michael Thompson concerning jackets on early copies of the RKP-Ogden series: “But if they actually exist, why then did I not see any in the 40 years I am in the profession now?” If anything, it possibly reduces the need to answer that question.

Michael will recognize the 3rd book from the left [Moore], which I just missed when it was offered in Australia. It then luckily could be acquired a few weeks later from his LA bookshop. The round hole removing the price before Australian distribution was mentioned in both descriptions.

 

The jackets can be dated 1923-1929, some are on the US issue of the title.

Therefore it is important, that after the line-up of the 11 titles shown, 2 additional titles could be acquired.

 

 

 

The publication year of both titles is 1922, the same as that of the Tractatus, and the starting year of the series. Both copies are from the UK issue of the title.

 

2. A search for any trace of RKP production records, finally locating them in the UCL Special Collections, London, UK.

The records include a Production Ledger

The following snapshot of the ledger shows the entry for the 1st edition of Wittgenstein, Tractatus [1922].  750 dustjackets are recorded in the last line at a date well before the issue date [November 23, 1922] stated in the heading of the entry. Thus it is physically possible, that copies came in jacket, also the first copy sold.

 

Those records prove to be quite accurate.

A special concern is therefore, that no jacket is recorded for Tractatus 2nd edition [1933]. Evidently the stock of 1922 printed jackets allowed not to print new ones in 1933. Using 1922 jackets on the 1933 edition is very well possible, as no 1st edition jackets known have an edition stated on them. Further the Rignano title discussed in the paragraph on secondary bindings shows, that on another occasion RKP stored a jacket for 23 years [1926-1949] before it was used on a bound copy.. However then the 750 jackets printed in 1922 are considerably less than copies gone into the UK 1st and 2nd edition.

The only possible explanation is, that part of the copies were issued without a jacket [to conservative booksellers?], and thus a jacketed copy is possibly not the exclusive original state.

 

Recently a 1933 edition showed up in a jacket without title:

 

 

Evidently no specific jacket for the title was available at the moment of issue, which is in line with the fact that no such jackets are recorded in the production ledger for this edition.

The other examples of variant issues show, that the suggested two UK variants of Tractatus from the same printrun are not very unusual in the time.

 

Closing remark

The copies discussed particularly suggest a transition time possibly between 1900 and 1930 for the exterior of a UK publishers binding. The transition concerns cutting and jacketing in which presently no time preference can be given to the variants identified. Possibly variant copies were  issued at the same time to different types of customers.